Evaluation of Different Forage Type Varieties of Pigeon Pea (Cajanus cajan) in Central Luzon

Authors

  • Leny Lyn G. Manalili Small Ruminant Center, Central Luzon State University
  • Emilio M. Cruz Small Ruminant Center, Central Luzon State University
  • Edgar A. Orden Small Ruminant Center, Central Luzon State University
  • Charlito R. Juico Research Extension, and Training, Central Luzon State University
  • Neal A. Del Rosario Small Ruminant Center, Central Luzon State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22137/ijst.2018.v3n1.02

Keywords:

agronomic parameter, forage, ICRISAT, Pigeon pea

Abstract

Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) is a drought-tolerant dual-purpose crop primarily grown as grain crop for human consumption. The ability of pigeon pea to produce economic yields under moisturedeficient soils makes it as an ideal crop to integrate in the crop-livestock farming for production of high-quality fodder.  Four pigeon pea forage-type variety of the International Crop Research Institute for the SemiArid Tropics (ICRISAT), namely: ICPL 87119, ICPL 13092, ICP 7035, and ICPL 20092, were planted to identify the best variety that is suitable under Central Luzon agro-climatic conditions. A total of 240 plants per variety were planted with 0.5 m x 0.75 m planting distance. The experiment plots were laidout using Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications at the Central Luzon State University. The varieties were evaluated by measuring the growth performance, herbage yield, dry matter yield, and disease tolerance.  Results showed significant variations in the survival rate of the different varieties. All varieties exhibited less than 85% survival rate. Among the varieties, ICP 7035 produced the highest herbage yield per hectare of 8.9 tons which was 24.71%, 58.42%, and 68.53% higher compared to ICPL 87119, ICPL 20092, and ICPL 13092, respectively.  Likewise, ICP 7035 showed the highest performance in all agronomic parameters measured except leaf to stem ratio. High leaf to stem ratio of 3.18:1 was observed from ICPL 20092.  However, ICPL 20092 was severely infested by mites (98%), while the rest were found to be resistant to mite infestation.

References

Bhengra S, Jeral ME, Kandeyang S and Pandey AC. 2010. Comparative Study of Growth and Yield Attributing Characters of Pigeon Pea (Cajanus cajan) under Integrated Weed Management Practices. International Journal of Tropical Agriculture. ISSN 0254-8755, 255-260.

Cook, B.G., Pengelly, B.C., Brown, S.D., Donnelly, J.L., Eagles, D.A., Franco, M.A., Hanson, J., Mullen, B.F., Partridge, I.J., Peters, M. and Schultze-Kraft, R. 2005. Tropical Forages: an interactive selection tool., [CD-ROM], CSIRO, DPI&F(Qld), CIAT and ILRI, Brisbane, Australia. Fabunmi TO, Adigbo SO, Odedina JN. 2010. Effect of Survivability of Pruning on Growth, Yield and Survivability of Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) in Pigeon pea / Pepper Alley Cropping. Journal of Agricultural Science and Environment. ISSN 1595-9694, 18-26.

ICRISAT. 2014. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-arid Tropics. www.icrisat.org/ (accessed April 2014).

Rao SC, Phillips WA, Mayeux HS and Phatak SC 2003. Forage and Grazing lands. Potential Grain and Forage Production of Early Maturing Pigeon pea in the Southern Great Plains. Crop Science Society of America 43:2212-2217.

SAS Institute Inc. (1993). SAS/STATSoft: Syntax, Version 6, first Edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.

Saxena KB, MG, Mula MG, Sugui FP, Layaoen HL, Domoguen RL, Pascua ME, Mula RP, Dar WD, Gowda CLL, Kumar RV and Eusebio JE. 2010. Pigeon pea: A Resilient Crop for the Philippines Dry lands. Information Bulletin No.85.Patancheru 502 324, Andhra Pradesh, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics. 80 pp. ISBN: 978-92-9066-529-8 Order code: IBE 085A.

Saxena KB. 2006. Seed Production Systems in Pigeon pea. Patancheru 502 324, Andhra Pradesh, India: International Crops research institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics. 76 pp. ISBN: 92-9066-4908.Order code BOE 040B.

Sharma S, N. Agarwal, and P. Verma. 2011. Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L .): A hidden treasure of regime nutrition. J. Funct. Environ. Bot. 1:91–101. doi:10.5958/j.2231-1742.1.2 .010

Van Soest PJ. 1994. Nutritional ecology of ruminant. 2nd edition. Ithaca, New York, USA: Cornell University Press.

Downloads

Published

2018-07-01